Solutions / Custom Services / Industry Experts

Industry Experts

Expert networks sell access by title. What matters is whether the person has done the specific thing you need to understand.

Verified, not claimedEmployment history checked and screening questions only a practitioner could answer.

Compliance screenedEmployment status, restrictions and conflicts checked before any engagement begins.

Standing accessRecurring panels where a question needs tracking rather than a one-off answer.

depth reach InterviewsPanelsSurveysField a mix, weighted to the question
Qualitative depthQuantitative reach

In simple terms

You tell us the expertise you need. We find practitioners who have actually done the specific thing, verify it, and arrange calls, panels or advisory time.

What Industry Experts is. Our expert network provides access to qualified industry practitioners for calls, panels and advisory engagements, screened on verifiable experience against your brief and compliance-checked before engagement.

What makes this different. Fieldwork quality is decided long before anyone answers a question: in the screener, the instrument design and the quality control. That is where most of our effort goes, and it is why the findings hold up.

What the service covers

These are the areas we work across, such as the ones below. We combine them in the proportion your question needs, and we tell you which ones your question does not need.

Expert sourcing

Practitioners identified against your brief, screened on specific verifiable experience rather than title match.

Compliance screening

Employment status, restrictions and conflict checks before any engagement, with the expert briefed on limits.

Call and panel facilitation

Scheduling, guides and moderation, so the hour produces specifics rather than a general industry conversation.

Standing panels

Recurring access to the same vetted group where a question needs tracking rather than a one-off answer.

Questions this answers

If something like this is on your agenda, the engagement is already half scoped.

  • Who has actually operated this process at scale?
  • Can we speak to someone who worked inside this company?
  • How do we verify claimed expertise before we pay for an hour of it?
  • How do we stay compliant with the expert's own obligations?
  • Can we build a standing panel we return to over time?

How you can use this

A few of the situations where this service does real work.

A specific operational question

You need someone who has run this exact process.

Access to practitioners, verified before you pay

Understanding an unfamiliar sector

You are moving into an area your team does not cover.

Operator-level knowledge at short notice

Testing a technical claim

A vendor or target claims something you cannot verify.

Independent assessment from people who would know

Building ongoing access

You need the same expertise repeatedly over time.

A standing vetted panel rather than repeated sourcing

What changes for your business

The practical difference between running on this and running on what you have now, such as the following.

You get evidence where none was published

Primary research reaches the questions no dataset answers, which is most of the questions that actually matter.

The data is clean enough to rely on

Screening, quality control and documented exclusion rules mean findings survive scrutiny rather than collapsing under it.

You get topline fast

Headline findings arrive within days of fieldwork closing, so decisions do not wait on the full report.

Respondents tell you the truth

Independent fieldwork changes what people are willing to say, particularly about what is going wrong.

You can run it again

Instrument, screener and methodology are handed over, so tracking the same question over time costs a fraction of the first wave.

You test before you commit

Concepts, prices and propositions get checked with real respondents while changing them is still cheap.

Who this is for

Roles that commission this work most often include those below. Each asks a different question and gets a different cut of the same evidence.

Research and insight teams

We need fieldwork we cannot run in-house.

Specialist capacity to your standards, with instrument, dataset and methodology handed over for reuse.

Product and marketing leadership

What do our customers actually think, rather than what we assume?

Evidence from real respondents, with verbatims, so findings can be acted on rather than debated.

Strategy and commercial leadership

Is there enough here to justify the investment?

Primary evidence on demand, pricing and competitive position where no published data exists.

Operations and quality leadership

Is what we designed actually happening in practice?

Independent observation and measurement, reported by location and behaviour so it supports coaching.

Investors and diligence teams

Can we verify this independently before we commit?

Primary market and customer evidence gathered to a defined protocol, with full quality control.

Typical clients

Enterprises needing evidence for a specific decisionMid-size companies without fieldwork capabilityIn-house insight teams needing extra capacityInvestors validating a market or customer baseOrganisations researching unfamiliar markets

How we work

The third step is the one that makes the output usable, and it is the one most work of this kind skips.

Step 1

Understand the decision

We start from what the findings have to support, because that decides sample, method and the precision you actually need to buy.

Step 2

Design and field properly

Screener, instrument and protocol built and piloted before full fieldwork, with quality control running throughout rather than checked at the end.

Step 3

Read it for your position

Findings are interpreted against your market position and the decision in front of you, not reported as a neutral data dump.

Step 4

Deliver so it can be reused

Dataset, verbatims, instrument and methodology handed over, so the next wave costs a fraction of the first.

One finding established once Upstream supplierProducer or provider Channel or partnerInvestor Secure capability earlyBring the change forward Prepare for the shiftReprice the exposure four different recommended actions
Step three in practice. Your position decides what a finding means.

What you receive

Full dataset with respondent metadata and quality flags

Topline findings within days of fieldwork close

Analytical report with verbatimscross-tabs and implications

Instrumentscreener and methodology note for reuse

Access to Phi, our AI research platformincluded

Every engagement comes with access to Phi. Ask questions of your own findings in plain language, pull the evidence behind any number, and keep querying long after the work is delivered. Your team gets the working intelligence, not just the document.

Open Phi
Request a sample Real work with the client's identity removed.

Ways to start

Tell us the decision and the date it has to be made by. We will recommend the smallest engagement that gets you there.

1-2 weeks

Pilot wave

A small first wave to validate approach, screener and instrument.

3-6 weeks

Full fieldwork

Complete fieldwork to target quota, with analysis and reporting.

Quarterly

Tracking programme

The same instrument repeated on a set cycle, reported as change over time.

Common questions

How do you verify expertise?

Employment history verification and screening questions on specifics only a practitioner would know. Title alone is not accepted.

How do you handle confidentiality obligations?

Experts are briefed on what they cannot discuss, and we terminate lines of questioning that would breach an obligation.

Who owns the work?

You do. It is exclusive to you, it is not resold, and working files are handed over unlocked.

Will you sign an NDA?

Yes, before the first conversation if you prefer.

Tell us the decision you are facing

Send us the question, the context and your timeline. You get back a recommended first step, what evidence it needs, and what it costs. Not a capability deck.